04 April 2008
The Concept of Exchange of Affection
In our culture, rarely is
anything given without the expectation of receiving something in return. People
give gifts, and expect a thank-you. People smile and expect the other person to
smile back. People are nice, and they expect that same niceness to flow back to
them. People love, and expect the object of that love to find them just as lovely.
The thing is, everyone’s got different things going on within him or her, so
it’s a near miracle when an exchange of any sort is on equal footing. The
expectation of such an equal exchange is really a set-up.
I notice this especially when I’m walking. There’s a great diversity in moods
and behavior in the people I pass. You have everything from the friendly to the
offensive. I’ve often been like a little mirror, reflecting the energy of
everyone I see, smiling when someone smiles at me, frowning as someone blows me
off, angry as someone is openly aggressive, defensive as I feel criticism
leveled at me. Instead of a relaxing walk by the ocean, it’s more like a roller
coaster of feelings—a roller coaster over which it feels like I have no
control. Of course, this isn’t true. I do have control. I haven’t exerted
control because I’ve believed in exchange. It has severely limited what I’ll
allow myself to experience.
It’s as if I’ve believed that I hold a bag full of appreciation, and I dole it
out like gold stars, according to the situation. If people don’t behave
according to my expectations, I withdraw that appreciation, and put it back in
my bag. I’m behaving as if I’m punishing the other individual by withholding
something valuable. The idea is that if I withhold this appreciation, the other
person will suffer and change their behavior. Except that my lack of
appreciation for someone doesn’t punish the other person. I’m the one who
suffers because, whether someone deserves it or not, it feels good to appreciate.
As I withhold that appreciation, I’m the one who feels tight and irritated. It
really has nothing to do with the other person.
When you believe that life is a ledger sheet, and everything has to balance
out, you’re not in control of your own happiness because someone else has to
behave in a certain fashion for you to feel appreciation for him or her. I
don’t like feeling so constrained. So I’ve decided that my purpose for being
here is to enjoy myself, and in pursuit of that end, I’m not going to require
that anyone do anything in particular for me to feel appreciation toward them.
That doesn’t mean I become a doormat. If someone is doing something I don’t
like, I’ll take whatever action I think I need to take, but at the same time,
I’m not going to withdraw the appreciation I feel toward that person because I
like that feeling of appreciating. It benefits me.
It has taken me a while to reach this conclusion. I’ve often been puzzled when
I’ve loved people who don’t love me back; sometimes they haven’t even liked me
back. Finally, I realized that I was viewing life as ledger sheet, and life
doesn’t work that way. Sometimes, the people you love aren’t able to return
your appreciation of them. Sometimes, they aren’t even close to understanding
your true feelings even when such feelings are expressed in plain language.
Sometimes people actively turn you into the enemy for their own purposes and
despite your feelings about them. And all of this is okay . . . except when you believe, as I have, that
life is supposed to be an even exchange—tit for tat. Then things get messy.
When you hold the belief that “if I think something nice about someone else,
they must return that thought,” you’re going to be disappointed with most
people because most people will not be able to fulfill your expectations. In
practical terms, just because you love or like someone that doesn’t mean that
they’re going to be able to return the feelings. That doesn’t mean that they
don’t deserve your appreciation. It means that they probably can’t see it, and
in light of that they’re going to have a near impossible time returning it even
if they want to return it. So I figure I might as well think of my appreciation
as a gift, and one that does not require a thank-you note because then I’m not
left to the whim of the people I deal with on a daily basis. I’m in control of
how I feel because I’m deciding instead of responding.
It’s a mighty powerful thing, I think, looking at it this way. It feels like
I’m moving from the passenger’s seat to the driver’s seat, from the puppet to
the puppeteer, from the reactor to the actor. From here on out, there will be
no more contracts for affection. I’m giving away appreciation for free.
Samantha Standish is a writer and a former intellectual property and corporate law lawyer. She received her B.A. in history with honors, and her B.A. in Spanish with honors, in 1989 from the University of California, Santa Barbara and went on to get her law degree Cum Laude from the University of Maine School of Law. In her legal career, Samantha worked in government and the private sector, most notably in the financial planning and software industry. In her personal life, she’s been married for twenty years and has a fifteen year-old home schooled son. Samantha resigned from the bar in 2005 and has devoted herself to bridge writing (making complex ideas about space/time easy to understand for the average reader) ever since, focusing mostly on self-help articles for artists and writing bridge books on the side. In her words, “The first forty years of my life were fact finding; the next forty years are about applying, expanding and exploring what I’ve learned.” Her books can be found at samanthastandish.com. Samantha’s NWV blog is titled The Magical Life.